Article
Toward Mandatory “TCFD” Reporting? The New Corporate Climate Reporting Framework Is Gaining Momentum
Article
Toward Mandatory “TCFD” Reporting? The New Corporate Climate Reporting Framework Is Gaining Momentum
The signs are clear: the climate reporting framework published by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) is evolving from a set of recommendations to soft law—and perhaps even hard law. This evolution regarding the TCFD calls for (accelerated?) preparation by companies and their management teams for this new framework, which places climate risks and opportunities at the heart of strategy.
The TCFD was established by the G20 during COP21 to develop recommendations regarding corporate financial transparency on climate issues. Chaired by Michael Bloomberg, its final report, published in June 2017, specifies the climate reporting elements expected in companies’ disclosure documents across four pillars: governance, strategy, risk management, and the indicators and metrics used (see Carbone 4’s summary of the TCFD’s final report here).
There are many signs that various stakeholders are genuinely taking the TCFD’s recommendations into account:
Climate reporting in the future will either be strategic or it won't be at all. And for good reason: the financial risks and opportunities associated with the energy transition and climate change are significant[4]. Companies therefore need to prepare for this, as there are still significant discrepancies between the TCFD’s recommendations and companies’ management reports (see Carbone 4’s analysis of TCFD compliance among CAC 40 companies here).
[1] Excerpt from the resolution “Starting in 2018, ExxonMobil has been publishing an annual assessment of the impacts of technological advances and global climate change policies on its long-term business portfolio […] This report will assess the resilience of the company’s entire scope of operations through 2040 and beyond, and examine the financial risks associated with such a scenario.” Source: https://tools.ceres.org/resources/tools/resolutions/exxon-2-degrees-scenario-analysis-2017/@@s3_view[2]http://www.mission2020.global/milestones/finance/[3]List of signatory companies:Aviva, Royal DSM, Enagás, Ferrovial, Iberdrola, Marks & Spencer, Philips Lighting, Wipro Ltd, WPP, and the French company Sopra Steria.[4] The damage covered by the CatNat program is estimated to be around 1.2 billion euros for Hurricane Irma.
Learn more at http://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2017/09/15/how-to-measure-the-cost-of-a-natural-disaster-like-irma_5186422_4355770.html#EbzVb4HjpSuBtp2J.99
Article written by Juliette DECQ – juliette.decq@carbone4.com
Subscribe to our contents